7 Kasım 2015 Cumartesi

U.S. Ramping Up Air Security After Egypt Plane Crash

The new security procedures will include expanded security screening of items put on commercial jets and airport assessments


(WASHINGTON) — The Homeland Security Department announced Friday a series of new security efforts aimed at international airports in the wake of the crash of a Russian jetliner over Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula.
DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson said the latest security protocols will focus on commercial flights bound for the United States from certain overseas airports in the region. He did not say which airports will be affected.
The new security procedures will include expanded security screening of items put on commercial jets, airport assessments and offers of security assistance for certain airports.
Russian carrier Metrojet’s Airbus A321-200 crashed shortly after takeoff from the Sharm el-Sheikh airport in Egypt on Saturday, killing all 224 people on board. There are no direct flights from that airport to the United States.
Though the investigation is ongoing, President Barack Obama has said the U.S. is taking “very seriously” the possibility that a bomb caused the crash.
British Prime Minister David Cameron said he has grounded all British flights to and from the Sinai Peninsula because of “intelligence and information” that points to a bomb as the probable cause of the crash.
On Friday, Russia announced that it will suspend all flights to Egypt until security is improved at its airports.
Michael Balboni, a security expert and former deputy secretary for public safety for New York state, said there are significant differences in the scrutiny of airport workers at overseas airports than in the United States. And in the wake of the downing of the Russian flight, those gaps are likely to gain renewed attention.
“Everything needs a refresh,” Balboni said. “Security is never a destination, it’s a journey. You have to change it up, you have to refresh it.”

Environmental Activists Prepare for Next Fight After Keystone Victory

                           Keystone is not enough, activists say

President Obama’s rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline marks the end of seven years of activism by environmentalists across the country. But, between celebrations on Friday, activists painted the decision as just the beginning of a new era of activism where any additional fossil fuel projects will not be tolerated.
“It’s good, and at the same it cannot be the extent of Obama’s work on climate,” said Lindsey Allen, Rainforest Action Network executive director, of Obama’s Keystone decision. “This is an opportunity to build on momentum and work to stop other projects like this.”
The next frontier—a campaign known as “keep it in the ground“—has been in the works since long before Obama reached his final decision about Keystone. Activists have used the phrase, which refers to stopping new and continued drilling of fossil fuels, in protest since at least the summer.
The hope is that Obama will use his executive authority to stop issuing new permits for coal, oil and natural gas operations on federal lands. The federal government currently leases 67 million acres of land for fossil fuel extraction. Such a radical switch in positions would be a surprising move for Obama, who has insisted that the U.S. exploit some fossil fuel sources like drilling in the Arctic and the Atlantic. But activists say that stopping Keystone seemed equally far-fetched when the campaign began years ago.
Activists also point to Obama’s use of language reminiscent of their own as evidence that their message had taken hold. “We’re going to have to keep some fossil fuels in the ground rather than burn them and release more dangerous pollution into the sky,” Obama said Friday. Still, other parts of Obama’s remarks acknowledge that the U.S. will continue to rely on fossil fuels to some degree for the foreseeable future.
Most of the “keep it in the ground” activism thus far has focused on attracting the support of elected officials and has been met with some success. Just this week Democratic Senators Jeff Merkley and Bernie Sanders introduced legislation to prohibit new leases of federal land for extraction. With the Keystone victory under their belt, environmentalists say they will begin to highlight a slew of other fossil fuel projects that require government approval.
“Moving forward it’s going to be very difficult for any fossil fuel project to move forward without opposition,” said Benjamin Schreiber, a director at Friends of the Earth. “We have new metric: if a project worsens climate change, we shouldn’t be approving it.”
In the more immediate future, activists say Obama’s Keystone announcement provides momentum ahead of international climate change negotiations to be held in Paris beginning later this month. Rejecting Keystone gives Obama a credibility he wouldn’t have had otherwise, they said.
“We have an opportunity to get a global agreement to dramatically cut those emissions,” Michael Brune, Sierra Club executive director. “This shows that the U.S. is serious about its commitment.”

How to Watch the Taurid Meteor Shower Fireballs

                   Pebble-sized meteors should put on big light show


A meteor shower that produces dazzling fireballs will be viewable later this month and is predicted to produce a dazzling display.
The Taurid meteor shower, named for the constellation Taurus, are often tepid and hard to see but are expected to be extremely bright this year, CBS reports. A “Taurid swarm” is expected to form, in which small fragments of a comet will burn in the Earth’s atmosphere and create fireballs. In the past, viewers of the shower have confused brightly burning Taurids for airplanes and fireworks.
Visibility of the meteor shower is expected to peak on Nov. 12 between midnight and 3 a.m. local time. It’s possible that some of the larger meteors will survive their trip through the atmosphere and reach the ground.

Syrian Rebels Used Mustard Gas, U.N. Watchdog Confirms

                          It said use chlorine gas was also likely


(THE HAGUE, Netherlands) — Insurgents in Syria used sulfur mustard in August, likely killing an infant, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said Friday.
The OPCW statement was the first official confirmation that sulfur mustard, often called mustard gas, has been used by insurgents in Syria.
An OPCW source told The Associated Press on Thursday that inspectors found evidence of sulfur mustard use by insurgents in the town of Marea on Aug. 21. Friday’s official confirmation shows another worrying escalation inSyria’s brutal civil war, which has already killed 250,000 people and forced millions to flee.
“In this case, the team was able to confirm with utmost confidence that at least two people were exposed to sulfur mustard, and that it is very likely that the effects of this chemical weapon resulted in the death of an infant,” the OPCW said.
The inspectors based their conclusions on samples they analyzed and interviews with two survivors and the physicians who treated them.
Sulfur mustard is an outlawed chemical weapon that attacks the skin, eyes, lungs and other internal organs.
When Syria joined the OPCW in 2013 under pressure from the international community, it declared a 1,300-ton chemical weapon arsenal that has since been destroyed. It is not clear how insurgents came to possess sulfur mustard.
The international watchdog also said another mission investigating allegations that toxic chemicals were used as weapons in Syria found that chlorine likely was used in March this year in fighting in Idlib.
In a third probe, this one into claims by the Syrian government that its troops were targeted with toxic chemicals in Jobar on Aug. 29, inspectors said they “could not confidently determine that a chemical was used as a weapon.”
The findings, which do not apportion blame for the chemical attacks, will be sent to the United Nations Security Council.

FCC Says It Can’t Stop Websites From Tracking You Online

It had been asked to make the "Do Not Track" setting in many browsers illegal to ignore

The Federal Communications Commission said Friday that it can’t force Internet companies like Google, Facebook and ad providers from tracking users online. The commission had been petitioned by the privacy advocacy group Consumer Watchdog to make the “Do Not Track” setting in many browsers illegal to ignore.
“Do Not Track” was created by researchers as a standard signal browsers can send along with other data when visiting a website. When detected, it is supposed to limit the amount of data advertisers and other online tracking companies collect. That reduced collection, however, must be voluntary: The setting merely indicates a preference. . .

Live Tapeworm ‘Still Wiggling’ When It’s Pulled Out of Man’s Brain

The creature was apparently "still wiggling" during the surgery

After experiencing severe headaches and vomiting, a California man was found to have a live tapeworm inside his brain.
The man, 26-year-old Luis Ortiz, was rushed to the hospital by his parents after blacking out. Doctors saw in X-rays that his brain was swelling and that the worm was inside of a cyst, the L.A. Times reports. A surgeon was able to perform a very complicated and delicate surgery to remove the entire cyst without bursting it, which could lead to infection. When the surgeon pulled it out, the worm was apparently “still wiggling.”
It’s unclear how Ortiz caught this tapeworm, but it likely came from something he ate (perhaps uncooked pork) and moved to his brain from another part of his body. The ordeal led to some memory loss, but after rehab and cognitive therapy, Ortiz has now been released from the hospital.

Hillary Clinton Looks Ahead to the General Election at Forum

Hillary Clinton tried at a Democratic forum Friday to soften her rhetoric on the death penalty and foreign policy while avoiding giving any answers that would alienate a general electorate.
At a South Carolina forum hosted by MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, Clinton worked to soften the edges on two areas where she is more hawkish than much of her party, a move that required her to walk a fine line with some answers.
In response to a question on the death penalty, she said that while she supports it in some cases, she would not be disappointed if the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional. Although she’s taken more hawkish positions than President Obama on issues from Libya to Syria, she said that she would not be more aggressive on foreign policy than he has been.
At the same time, Clinton made a pitch for keeping a big tent. “We need to understand more about why people either are not voting at all, leaving the field to maybe those they disagree with or whose interests are not the same, or why other people don’t trust the Democratic Party or a progressive approach to solving these problems,” she said.
The forum began with former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, both of whom faced similar questions and sought to appeal to the Democratic base.
While her two rivals took shots at Clinton and made their case, Clinton seemed to already be looking ahead to her potential Republican opponents.
In one of her most carefully worded answers, Clinton hedged her opposition to the death penalty.
“I do think a number of states, predominantly but not exclusively in the South, have moved much too quickly to try people for capital offenses that carry the death penalty,” Clinton said. “If the Supreme Court said, ‘No, it violates the 8th Amendment, it’s cruel and unusual punishment,’ I would breathe a sigh of relief about that.”
But, she added, “I do have some, you know, questions about removing it completely for terrorism, as an example.”
Clinton mentioned Timothy McVeigh and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as the types of terrorists who could deserve the death penalty. “So there are some really heinous crimes that are, in my view, still arguably ones that should potentially have the death penalty.”
O’Malley, by contrast, boasted of outlawing the death penalty in Maryland as Governor in 2013.
Clinton has pushed for greater American involvement in Syria and advocated for U.S. intervention in Libya as secretary of state, both issues that put her at odds with President Obama. She also was one of the stronger voices on Obama’s Cabinet in favor of the mission to kill Osama bin Laden.
Clinton was asked whether she would more aggressive around the world than Obama.
“No, here’s why,” Clinton said. “I want us to use diplomacy, which is why I spent 18 months putting together the sanctions against Iran, so that we could force them to the negotiating table to try to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon and end the talk of bombing them and going to war against them, but instead using diplomacy.”
But Clinton also made clear she would be ready to use the military, which a significant majority of Americans support in Syria. “However,” Clinton continued, “I will not— I think it’s irresponsible—to rule out force. I just will not do that.”
Sanders has strongly criticized Clinton’s vote in favor of the Iraq War, and on Friday gave some of his most detailed foreign policy ideas for the Middle East of the campaign, saying that Muslim countries near Syria need to “roll up their sleeves and get their troops on the ground and start taking on ISIS in a way they have not yet done.” He opposes a no-fly zone over Syria, which Clinton favors.
During a round of more light-hearted questioning, Rachel Maddow asked Clinton whether she was an introvert or an extrovert. “Extrointrovert,” Clinton answered, saying that she “loves” spending time with people on the campaign trail but she also likes to spend time alone to “think and relax, and sleep, and stuff like that.”
She outright refused to answer, however, which Republican candidate she would chose if forced as her running mate. “I know, I know you’re going to be disappointed, I know that, you know, people are going to say I dodge the question. The fact is, I am dodging it. I don’t want to pick any of them,” she said.
SEE HILLARY CLINTON'S EVOLUTION PHOTO

Teenager: Hillary Rodham poses in her 1965 senior class portrait from Park Ridge East High School in Illinois.